Arthur Dawn, Columnist

About Arthur Dawn: Manager of the Allentown Square Apartments in downtown Buffalo, NY in the historic area known as the lower west side. Arthur is also a computer and marketing consultant. 

Arthur Damn

Arthur Dawn



December 2022

You may have heard recently how Elon Musk has been firing, at times illegally depending on region and contract, people by the hundreds from Twitter. This naturally has been praised by the “I am not poor, just temporarily not rich” crowd who believe that if they kiss up to the rich enough maybe that fortune would rub off on them.
This brings us to noThis image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is picture2.pngt as recent news of railroad strikes and the atrocious response of the board of directors. The board has said the quiet part out loud and revealed what they always believed. That it is not the work that generates value but the owners by their incredible “Risk taking and capital” are the ones generating profit. That was how they were justifying their multi-million-dollar paychecks. I strongly recommend readers investigate it.
The situation is not much better in the tech sector either. The software engineers who get 100k+ salaries etc. generally must move to higher cost-of-living areas such as Boston, San Francisco, etc. where that hefty paycheck mostly goes to the landlord. While few enjoy the benefits of owning property in those places even better yet, their trust funds can make cash offers on assets to avoid the rising interest rates entirely.
When asked why the only answer we get is that these people took this beautiful and magical “Risk” and are now enjoying the benefits.
What is this nebulous risk that they are taking when the legal structure protects their fortunes and if they are big enough, they get bailed out of their irresponsible risk-taking? While the employee can lose their entire livelihood if their boss decides to fire a few people that day for any reason. I say we ought to end this charade and face the music. The only reason extreme rich exists is not that they do something that contributes to society but because the hype is the main currency that props up the value, they got from already being rich.
I urge all the readers to look deeper into the actual contributions of all the people in the Forbes 100 list and find if they added any value besides the money, they either convinced their rich friends to put in or the money they had by the virtue of being born into the rich class.




October 2022

Let’s start by stating the obvious, corporate media not only lies but also manipulates people into believing whatever their publishers want them to believe. Press used to be about revealing facts and letting people come to their conclusions; that is long dead. Solution: Independent media, Problem: It is too small and niche. This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is 62103734_346144522739044_6337883282209767424_n-1.jpg
There are usually good, independent media outlets out there covering specific things, local news, business news, etc. Sadly, very few if not all of them will cover global topics without a specific angle. Quite sadly that angle also tends to be what hooks people up. You just must make sure that angle is not clouding their objectivity, or it is not too skewed. For example, China is Uncensored, sure it is always negative of China but if you want positive coverage of China, you can go to business news (because they will cover China positively out of fear of getting banned from China) or state-sponsored propaganda.
Unfortunately, sometimes you need the bigger picture or the latest updates around the world which is what mainstream or corporate media specializes in. I have talked a few times about why they are horrid, but I think the picture here will summarize it:
Some topics are fortunately pretty cut and dry such as the war in Ukraine. As such I find myself going to the BBC News coverage simply because independent media may not have the resources for the extensive coverage. As a result, while certainly my opinion of the situation may be tainted, in situations where things are black and white, we cannot deny the resources of the corporate media are certainly superior.
In other words, it is fine to consume mainstream corporate media but only for the topics where the answer is clear to you. Just remember that this ease of access can leave you vulnerable to propaganda should you cover other topics. I say we should always choose our media sources carefully and be vigilant



“Change your perspective and reality changes” — Aristoteles

 September  2022

Last month we talked about one of the biggest questions the executives are asking:

 “How do we keep people from quitting without paying them more?”

You could argue better workload etc. but those can also be quantified as pay, I want to propose a more creative solution that will please both sides.
The first one was to encourage work from home. This time we will talk about Embrace Streamlining.
There is an archaic idea that the worker must always suffer at work. The owners of this idea will not admit it, but their actions speak louder than words and they will try to hide it behind “Not a good look” or “It doesn’t look professional.”
These people got away with it at a time of abundance when after the loss caused by such bad practices, you still were able to make a profit. It is from simple things, such as not letting cashiers sit while working to making sick leave worse than the disease itself, such as asking for a doctor’s note — from a job that does not provide health insurance.
I have a simple principle as a manager and a teammate. Trust above all else; if I cannot trust you to do your job to the best of your ability, at a pace that you know how to choose, then that is not a thing that can be fixed without a major shake-up and only that person can fix it.
Bosses must be able to fundamentally trust that their workers can do their job after being trained and slowly let go of the leash and let people work to the best of their ability. These “Cruelty is the point” practices are not only deplorable ethically they are also harmful financially. Exponentially so the higher skill and responsibility levels involved.
Effectively, this paradigm shift can let people optimize their work to not only provide better performance but also make it more consistent. Sure, there will be crunch times, but I am yet to meet an artist or developer that would not perform crunch for a project they care for. I think management needs to learn to trust their workers and workers live up to that trust.
The other part of this process is embracing improvements, automation, and comforts. If you find a way to do a job better or more comfortably and the management resists their silly reasoning, then it is time to look elsewhere for the worker and time to understand this potential improvement.
The days of low-efficiency businesses are dying as we are in a more receding tide of the economy.



 August 2022

In the wake of continued “The Great Resignation” companies are still struggling with basic economic principles, which is understandable because most of them have never seen the power shifting to the labor as they collectively started to wake up. Now we are hearing from the insiders in corporate America’s 1-billion-dollar question, a question but more of a ‘squirm’ from corporations who do not want years of wage depression to affect their record-breaking profits.
“How do we retain our talent without raising pay?” Yes, if you investigate any work forum with employees around and above middle management, you will hear this often. The most common answer has been laughably coming from MBA’s, “More team building events, more pizza parties!” The level of obliviousness that can only be rivaled by most out-of-touch emperors. Today however I would like to present other answers to this mind-boggling question for out-of-touch oligarchs. Encourage work from home: I was writing about the benefits of working from home even before the pandemic. Sadly, it takes a massive global crisis for us to make progress sometimes. It is baffling to this day there are still workplaces that try to resist this despite the obvious benefits for the company, namely:
You now can reduce the needed office space, directly cutting overhead massively. Large meetings no longer have physical constraints. No excuses for being late or reserving a conference room.  No more productivity loss due to water cooler/cubicle chatter.  No more recruitment constraints for location, no need to pay for employee relocation. If the best programmer I am looking for is living in a bunker in the middle of Arkansas, I can now have him join us without any issues.  No need to pay for lunch catering.
Let’s consider the benefits of this for employees, mind you every one of these makes the position more enticing and people will be considering these when making decisions to leave or stay. 
No more commuting, need I say more? Cut to dry cleaning costs, some savings of time and money for people who need to wear suits. Ability to collaborate with teammates anytime, anywhere. Ability to take care of other chores during breaks/lunch breaks.  Much greater control over one’s environment.
There may be some cons to this and now that we have seen various companies experimenting with working from home we can now more accurately list the cons:
Some people who have little control over their work area have more distractions. These may prefer a more hybrid model. Chatty catty employees cannot bother people in their cubicles. People without basic IT skills can have problems troubleshooting the issues with their connection to work on computers; fortunately, with now remoting in, this has been largely mitigated.
Now comes the largest one: Middle managers who did not contribute anything to their teams now are at risk of being found out and losing their jobs. This terrifies them for such people generally get their positions by cozying up to the higher-ups and working from home makes it much harder. Some people will do anything to avoid an honest day’s work sadly and the main thing they will do is scream and shout how change is bad, and they deserve their positions.

In the next issue, we will be looking at another addition to this answer, Embrace Streamlining



July 2022

The idea that our emotional capacity has limits is not a new concept but anyone who has been regularly reaching their emotional limits will know it is a strange thing and it does not simply get “refilled” the next day and we may require more than one day, and certain interactions will consume more of it.
To give you a betterThis image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is july-2022-page-9.jpgr perspective, think about the term, “I don’t have the time to do X.” In truth, we both know it is not that you do not have the time, but you do not have the energy to do it. You need this “time” to do recharging activities. In other words — recharging emotional energy.
Being aware of this concept is an important step in increasing control over life and when done right, effectively increasing the time we have available to ourselves. We spend over 70% of our days not fully in control of habits etc. By doing the activities that recharge us more and avoiding things that drain us. In theory, we can increase the effective use of this energy that bottlenecks our productivity and have “more time”.
Think about what activities make you feel ready to go and tackle the next thing on your list. Note down those things and try to move things around to add that activity more to your life. Then think of things that drain your emotional energy then avoid them. It is hard to predict how much you will be drained, however, we know that just like a muscle we can improve its capacity, and just like a muscle we can injure it if we do not use it properly.



June 2022

If you are among the lucky and shrinking few who have lived above paycheck to paycheck, you may have noticed that 2022 has not been a good stock year. In fact, not only has 2022 wiped out most of the market gains so far, but it has wiped out over five years of stock growth for some companies. 
Most people try to sell and cut their losses; according to CNBC, that seems to be the primary source of falling stock price at writing (5/10), and they are just glad they bought high and sold not too much lower. This is a recipe for losing money in the stock market, and today I will reiterate lessons from David Lynch and Benjamin Graham to help you navigate this upset.
When you buy This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is june-2022-page-4-2.jpgstocks, you have effectively invested in that company; you buy into a company because you trust that company. It is the fundamentals that you should be buying it for, not for any emotional sense. Even when the market is in turmoil, a good company will remain. This means the good company will recover when conditions improve, while a bad company may never recover the heights it reached when the market felt jovial.
When a price change occurs, you need to ask, “Why did that occur?”
There are two reasons: the fundamental evaluation has changed, or the overall market conditions have changed. In today’s market, we see inflation problems, thanks to wanton money printing of FED, the continuing pandemic, and the war in Ukraine. This, of course, had caused the markets to downturn until these problems were resolved. These issues are compounded by the retail investors, which is the fancy name for individual, smaller investors, selling their shares to cut their losses—plunging the markets even further.
Benjamin Graham likens the market to a madman who comes to your office whenever you open your stock account and tells you the price he will buy or sell a piece of the company. At times, this madman is fearful; a good investor buys these companies at lower values than they are fundamentally worth. When the madman is greedy, he believes and sells them at higher levels than they are fundamentally worth.
This naturally makes you think that you may be able to time the market right and buy when it is low and sell when it is high. Sadly, there is little way of knowing how the market will react to a particular news piece, but it certainly always comes around. For intelligent investors, now is the time to buy what they can and hold what they have.
Otherwise, you fall into the #1 enemy of any investor: Emotions.



May  2022

While the war is raging on in Ukraine, Russia is suffering significant defeats on the Northern Front and is being pushed back as a part of Ukraine’s “strategy.”
We should be aware of the possible future scenarios that can affect our livelihoods here in the United States. Those who have been investing and following the markets saw that effect last month. I have had the unfortunate experience of studying the behaviors of autocratic regimes firsthand, and the way I foresee the war going, as far as the west is concerned, are these scenarios from most likely to least likely:
Putin goes out with a whimper, and things return to somewhat normal: The most likely something I see happening, the way the war is going, is Russia getting pushed back to their original borders, potentially including Crimea, and then a long defensive skirmish on the Ukrainian border while Putin hopes Russian citizens get used to the new normal and the new Iron Curtain. Finland and Sweden will join NATO without much fanfare, and eventually, war will die down years down the line. The Russian media admitted to the government’s faults when it could no longer hurt the government’s image.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is may-2022-page-4-2.jpg

Sanctions Work and Russian Government Capitulates: Despite its iron grip on the population, there will be a public disorder if food stops coming. Naturally, such regimes prioritize paying and supporting their armed forces to remain in power a lot like a warlord. A brief time of discontent can put the government on the defensive and make them negotiate ways of saving face and reaching a compromise. Instead of annexing those regions, as Russia originally wanted, the local populace could gain some degree of autonomy. Those regions can return to the way they used to be before the Meydan Protests. Still live and speak Russian but am politically part of Ukraine. It would be likely that Ukraine would join NATO and possibly the EU, while Russia would start a long rebuild of its international relations.
Escalation due to Finland and Sweden joining NATO, losses in Ukraine: If Russia fails to hold its currently declared goals, it is very likely “The Special Operation” will be escalated into a full-blown war. This is important since this will allow the Russian government to start drafts and justify more extreme measures to continue the fight. It is also possible, with this newfound workforce (but lacking in materials that have not stopped the red army before), that Russia will make incursions into Finland to prevent them from joining NATO.
However, I do not foresee this escalating into nuclear war for various reasons; even any escalation is unlikely, given the current circumstances.



April 2022

What Russia is doing to Ukraine is unforgivable! Unfortunately, most people familiar with the region had predicted the invasion. What they have not predicted, however, was the strong resistance and how bungling or incompetent the Russian forces have been.


While there is a lot of propaganda on both sides, we should not overreact to all the news. It is simply like the news coverage shows only the things that will attract the most attention and support that have been built.
News agencies will not stop; this goes for both sides, pushing whatever narrative works for them, and using the war as a cover to display their propaganda.
 What we need to do is to take the time, to do some research to get a better or near objective picture. One should rely on more independent and respected news organizations to get the information, to get the picture.  For example, based on my research, I found the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) coverage to be the most informative and thorough.
 Sadly, one of the most common things in a crisis like Ukraine is for groups or organizations to collect financial support for the victims, which on the surface, is all well and good, the right thing to do. But unfortunately, there are lots of unscrupulous organizations or agencies who use this as an opportunity to steal or funnel money, if not more money, into the pockets of the people at the leadership level — CEO, Executive Director, Board of Directors, etc.
As such, I would urge our readers, before thThis image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is picture2.pngey donate money or supplies, to please research the people and organizations inviting you to donate or contribute to help Ukraine. It has been well documented that numerous charity organizations, including well-known ones, have a history of a corrupt way of handling public donations. Their Executives receive millions of dollars in salaries and bonuses each year while most of the donations never reach their targets.
This information is public, so if you have the time or need to know, take the time, and research it online, you are only a few clicks away.  When it comes to donations, always look for people who are confirmed to be able to get your hard-earn cash to the desired destination. Make sure their claims, collection, and logistics are well documented.
Ukraine needs our support. Let’s make sure that our support and donations are getting there; and not into the pockets of executives running some of the  “charitable” organizations in the United States.



March  2022

Last time we saw what red flags the wantrepreneur types tend to show. This time, I would like to address the unseen victims of these failed businesses when they are funded enough to have employees or even clients, at times thousands of them. I like to explain the tale of Basari School, the company that according to its owner, had “grown too fast”.
In the early 2000s, one of the fastest-growing wine “cram schools” in Turkey had decided to their school which seemed like a good idea at the time.  If they had more control over the children outside of the few hours a day, then they could increase their test scores even further. They advertised like crazy, and they had a few years of student test results to back it up. However, it is impossible to tell if the success of the students was because of the cram school, or if was it because they managed to give generous scholarships to students that were already successful. The public could not tell the difference; all they knew was this school was getting successful students and it was expensive, a perfect recipe for an educational con. They even had foreign teachers which was a huge privilege. What compliance goes wrong? For about 5 years nothing did. That was until the bills started coming due, and banks no longer cared about “growth.” They wanted to see the cash.  I had won a partial scholarship there and went there. In the first year, it was just like it was advertised —  foreign teachers, fancy uniforms, lots of schoolwork, cutting-edge facilities, etc. At the end of my first year, there were rumors that teachers were not being paid, and that some were no longer coming to class, getting substitutes instead. No official information everything was hush-hush. The owner was known to be an angry man who fires staff and expels students at the slightest provocation.   At the start of my 2nd year (7th grade), the cracks began to show. Teachers not coming in became the norm, and we would simply watch TV or be left alone to our devices for the year. It was great but suspicious. The owner made more and more public appearances, and we would hear more and more excuses. We would see posters saying how great the company was, however, their argument seemed to be centered around how many new cram schools they opened. Parents were growing skeptical but continued to be kept in the dark. Any rumors of unattended classes or teachers not showing up would be dismissed. This was before social media —  and before the time and technology in Turkey would be viewed with skepticism and outright bans from authority.
In the end, the news broke that the owner built his educational empire on loans, coming from various sources, and paying existing loans with new ones. Rumors of mob involvement came to light. Not long afterward the school was demolished, and the lot remained empty for many years. Teachers not part of a union are left without pay, and thousands of students are left with no education. The staff ended up without jobs or pay. Others who were indirectly responsible washed their hands and testified against the owner — the only one that went to jail for fraud.  We do not hear from the media about that trillion-dollar company collapsing.  It is said that every OSHA regulation is written in blood; perhaps we should not wait long enough for every SEC regulation to be written in blood-soaked dollars.
Note: A cram school, informally called crammer and colloquially also referred to as test-prep or exam factory, is a specialized school that trains its students to achieve goals, most commonly to pass the entrance examinations of high schools, or universities.


Part 1 of 3


Ever seen start-up hipster types always talking about their “killer business idea” in vague terms because they are afraid someone will steal it as if the idea is the hard part of starting a company?  If yes, then you have seen this bane of actual businesses. These wannabes Steve Jobs types come from many walks of life. I have noticed that they take pleasure in talking about the startups rather than you know, working on the product and getting it out there — which is exactly why a lot of actual potential value has gone to waste. Companies like Theranos (valued at 10bn at a time WITH NO WORKING PRODUCT) or Nikola (Again no working product, insane valuation, and General Motors buy-out deal) are just the tips of the iceberg.
These companies not only lose investors billions of dollars (investors such as your average people to retirement fund managers) but also their employees who could have been working on a viable product (instead of the mad fantasies of someone who has watched too many Sci-fi movies and spent too little time in a lab). One would expect for SEC to have regulations against such things — such as not accepting investments without a working prototype and approval process.
These 2 components are important because, as you dig deeper into the minds of these wantrepreneurs, you will find they like to talk about something called “exit strategy”, namely being valued high enough that they can dump all their stock and live comfortable or be acquired by a larger company and wash their hands clean of it: like Myspace and other products. Unlike those products, however, these people have little to no intention of turning a profit. This is of course dangerous, and a trend of this can easily cause another .com bubble.  Now that we have learned what a wantrepreneur is, let’s talk about how to recognize such companies. Every investor wants to beat the market but for every Amazon, 100 Nikolas are operating on the same operational procedure, namely, making no profit for over a decade to increase market share.
Wantrepreneurs are a clear dangerous investment. They can hide quite well and usually are very convincing on the surface, led by charismatic manipulators who have little to no technical knowledge or interest. They think that if they throw their “magic” which can be anything besides actual technical work and other people’s money at the problem, the problem will be solved. It worked for every other problem in their usual, very privileged lives.
I have observed from multiple angles (unwitting client, employee, and technical partner) how these people will cause so much wasted value, and as such, have noticed a few common patterns in companies like this. I hope by sharing this information, my readers will be able to recognize and avoid such companies. In my next column (part 3), I will try to highlight the effects of such people on those that do not make it to the news.  The first red flag you should be looking for is when they always talk about everything surrounding the product or service but never the actual product. When asked about the product, they explain they need to be careful or afraid that their great idea will be stolen, the reason for not sharing.  In truth, they are afraid of being found out. Quite frankly, as soon as I hear the latter part, I just tune out….. (Part 2, March Issue)




In this column, I try to discuss things that I think people should know, although I was hoping to write something about the tech industries. Something has lately drawn my attention to Taiwan, something that is not being talked about or addressed nearly enough. The situation between China and Taiwan has reached a point where staying neutral has no longer become possible with the involvement of Japan and thus, the concerns of the United States.
Why is Taiwan important to the USA?
Besides being a major manufacturer of microchips, Taiwan is a small democratic country being threatened by a major superpower. If the USA seeks to keep its role as a superpower, it will have to protect its fellow democracy, which is threatened by its rival, unlike Afghanistan. This time other US allies will doubt the United States’ capability in protecting Taiwan. This has recently become a situation that can no longer be avoided with the policy of ambiguousness that the USA has pursued thus far. With Japan announcing its support for Taiwan, the lack of US support or response to the upcoming Taiwanese invasion is obvious.
Will this lead to an all-out war with China? It’s possible. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has made “Unification” with Taiwan one of its chief goals. In the event of war, and due to the nature of totalitarian regimes, any investments made in China are very likely to be seized outright, considering that Chinese law allows it — as well as any collected data and intellectual property. It would be quite ironic, considering that much of the CCP war effort has been financed by US investment firms whose CEOs and their executives, admitted ignorance of the goals and nature of these regimes — as revealed in an interview with Ray Dalio, of Bridgewater Associates, with CNBC’s Squawk Box, Nov. 2021).
A storm might be coming, and I am not referring to the weather.



December 2021

The word, “Great Resignation”, has been going around recently, referencing a recent economic phenomenon where people would, en masse, resign from their place of employment to look for better opportunities in employment place. Some see it as an extraordinary event, some are upset, and others are just happy that people are finally moving or pushing the employment market in the right direction.
The Great Resignation, also known as the Big Quit, is the ongoing trend of employees voluntarily leaving their jobs, from spring 2021 to the present, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the American government refusing to provide necessary worker protection, and wage stagnation despite rising costs of living. Some economists described the Great Resignation as a general strike while discussing Striketober, a strike wave that began in October 2021.
One thing that I have not seen in all the Forbes and other Journal articles, however, is how can Economics explain this. Is this as extraordinary as it sounds? The answer is simple, this is covered in the Neo Keynesian School of Economics, under Sticky prices of Labor (The sticky wage theory is an economic concept describing how wages adjust slowly to changes in labor market conditions).
New Keynesian economics is a modern macroeconomic school of thought that evolved from classical Keynesian economics. This revised theory differs from classical Keynesian thinking in terms of how quickly prices and wages adjust. New Keynesian advocates maintain that prices and wages are “sticky,” meaning they adjust more slowly to short-term economic fluctuations. This, in turn, explains such economic factors as involuntary unemployment and the impact of federal monetary policies.
Unlike other markets where prices are dictated by supply and demand, wages tend to remain above equilibrium as employees resist wage cuts.
Let me briefly elaborate. The Keynesian part, in this school of thought — while markets are indeed the best-known way to allocate resources — cannot reach equilibrium, or even get out of crises properly, without government intervention.
Neo Keynesian school focuses on the real and observed economic phenomena to the original thought and proposes the concept of wage rigidity, where companies are not updating the wages to the current market rates and living conditions.
What we have seen now, with the market disruptions and the information being able to spread quickly, employees demanding these sticky prices to get more in line with more recent market demands, in terms of both finances and benefits wisely. This shows that sometimes, markets need a little push to update their equilibrium conditions.
How does knowing this information benefit you on an individual level? Being able to explain this phenomenon, hopefully, will protect you from all the propaganda going around on both sides (looking at your Forbes contributors and Reddit); but even more, allow you to see your career position in line with the greater picture, to hopefully, let you direct your career better. Information like this is our eyes and ears in the world at large.




October 2021

I had the privilege of meeting a former teacher/educator from the Bronx, NY, who is now living in Buffalo.  I don’t know how we started talking about Education but she opened up and talked to me about the way politicians and government give very little or no priority to Education; you can see it in the way they treat teachers, educators, and the teacher shortage nationwide, and the on-going need for qualified teachers in troubled areas. With all these concerns, you would think teachers would be welcomed with open arms, but that is not the case. After talking to her for a while, I took interest in her story and asked her if it was ok for me to publish her story by asking her questions regarding her experience.
Here it goes:
Latino Village: Can you begin by telling us a little about your background and your educational preparation for becoming a teacher?
 Samantha Didrichsen: Most of my career, thus far, has been in the realm of early childhood education, which in New York, ranges from birth to second grade. I hold two education degrees: a Bachelor of Science (Early Childhood Education), with a concentration in Biology from SUNY Fredonia in 2015; and a Master of Science in Education (Special Education & Early Childhood Intervention),  graduating from  Hofstra University in 2017. With the two degrees, plus my exams are taken, I am certified to teach both general and special education students within the early childhood population. I also specialize in ABA (applied behavior analysis) from my Hofstra program, which uses the science of behavior analysis to change social behaviors. Many times, this is associated with the treatment and education of those with autism, but this can be used for anyone. The techniques that I use in my carThis image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is 231806444_1025200144963329_1965243676292922363_n.jpgbeer for all my students comes from ABA. I’ve held several different types of positions since my Fredonia graduation. I’ve been a toddler teacher, a behavior technician, an elementary school special education teacher, a preschool special education teacher, and an early intervention teacher, and some I’ve held at the same time!
Latino Village: What made you decide to go into teaching?
 Samantha Didrichsen: When asked this question, people tend to have some sort of dramatic story to tell about how a teacher affected them and made them decide to become teachers. This is not my story. Truth be told, I wasn’t sure what to do with my life for a very long time. As a child, I had this dream of being a published writer, mostly inspired by J.K Rowling. I was an avid reader (I’m jealous of past me). I would write so many different stories of my original characters or fan fiction from different anime series. One time I wrote an original story that went beyond two-hundred pages! I did it all for fun. I was pushed to go to college. My father had gone to college, and my mother tried, but it wasn’t for her. They wanted their children to do better than them, and I can understand that. When I was a junior at Massapequa Senior High School back on Long Island, I spoke with my A.P English Composition teacher, Mr. Merges, about my idea of getting a degree in Creative Writing. He told me to think about that—maybe consider English education instead. We went back and forth slightly about this. I feel that he understood my love of writing but maybe wanted some job security for this poor young woman who had some serious self-esteem issues. There was a point where he told me, “You know you’ll have to get a master’s, right?” and I said, “That’s okay.” He shrugged and said, “Alright then!” After looking more into it, I felt that English education wasn’t for me. However, I found something else that I might like, which was early childhood education. It struck a chord with me. The high school had a relationship with Junior Achievement to do volunteer work in elementary school classrooms in the district, and so I signed up and did that. I also earned high school credit to help me graduate on time (I had moved into the district and was short a credit) by completing a summer internship called Summer STARS, where you volunteer as an assistant at the summer school. I enjoyed working with the preschool students the most, so that sold it for me.
Latino Village: If you don’t mind me asking, how much did your education cost?
Samantha Didrichsen: In total, my entire education, grants, and scholarships put into it cost me a little less than $100,000 in student loan debt. If I could estimate my cost per degree, I believe that my time at Fredonia cost me somewhere between $25-28,000. From there, however, is where I had to take the big pill for my state-mandated master’s degree. Hofstra was extremely expensive. Getting into a SUNY or a CUNY for your graduate degree is an accomplishment, as they are exceptionally selective because of the limited seats and lower cost in tuition and fees. At that time, I required housing if I were to continue my education in New York, and I didn’t want to teach full-time and get a degree at the same time. While I loved Western New York, Buffalo State was the only one that had the early childhood special education graduate degree that I wanted, but they didn’t offer graduate housing. So, I was forced to look back in the New York City and Long Island areas at their private institutions, as the CUNYs also didn’t offer houses.  Hofstra did, and the graduate program that I graduated from with them was also affiliated with a big federal grant to boost the amount of early childhood special education teachers in the field. Since I needed housing, Hofstra easily put another $80-90,000 into my debt within two years.
Latino Village: I rememberThis image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is 233136920_253670986358236_263228329059890566_n.jpgr that you had taught in the Bronx, in a lower-income neighborhood where education is most needed, can you tell us about your experience?
 Samantha Didrichsen: Absolutely. This will be a long story, as I taught for both the public school system and a non-profit organization down in the South Bronx. During my final spring semester at Hofstra, it was evident that I would most likely be teaching in New York City. I had plans to move into my then-fiancé’s home with him and his parents in Rockland County, so I was applying for teaching positions both in Rockland, Manhattan, and the Bronx due to us being in the lower Hudson Valley. I was very interested in the pub public school stems at the time, as I was very supportive of them. I had attended public education my entire life, minus my time at Hofstra.  I applied to be a Select Recruit in the Early Hiring program for the New York City Department of Education, which I’ll be calling the city DOE from now on. The city and state Department of Education offices are two separate entities. At the time in 2017, the Select Recruit program was aiming to do early hiring to get more teachers into the Bronx.  I had gone to three hiring events and was turned down by at least a dozen principals on the spot. One principal slammed my resume down on the table as soon as she started reading it and said, “I hate when you people do this!” I asked what the problem was, and she pointed to my certificates.
“You people when you only get certified up to second grade!” This means, that we early childhood professionals who don’t get an additional degree or advanced certificate expand our age range to 6th grade. I should have realized that that fast chat wasn’t going anywhere, and I should have walked away. But that’s all in hindsight now, and you always learn with experience. I was called back to several different schools in the Bronx for second interviews. I even demoed for two. Out of the two, I was offered a position at P.S 226 as a Kindergarten special education teacher to work in an ICT classroom (integrated co-teaching with a general education teacher). I thought I was set. City DOE public records had shown that the school’s data was relatively well for them down in the University Heights section. However, the retention of staff statistics wasn’t that fantastic. School quality reports for the 2016-17 school year only showed that the number of teachers with three or more years of experience working within that school was 53%. This didn’t pique my interest at the time. Before the first day of school, my position changes twice. Over the summer, I received notice that there weren’t enough Kindergarteners coming in with IEPs (Individualized Education Plan), so they were turning me into a SETSS teacher (Special Education Teacher Support Service) to work within the early childhood grades and pull students out of their classrooms to form academic support groups. Then, a week before school started, I was notified that again I was going to be teaching in an ICT 2nd grade classroom with 28 children and one general education teacher. It didn’t take long for me to find out that not only did my new partner didn’t want to teach in a special education classroom, but why I have moved around—there were already special education teachers quitting before the school year started. By the end of the first month, my partner and I had a rocky relationship. And I can understand. When you don’t get a choice as to what and how you’re teaching, it can be beyond frustrating. Plus, we both had very different styles of teaching and beliefs on how to teach the children.
She was very forceful and would yell at the children and belittle them, just like many of the other teachers at the school. That wasn’t me and I don’t support that. As the year went on, we barely spoke, as she would belittle me as well and eventually turn the grade against me. Backtracking slightly, but come October of 2017, I was working two jobs at 226. My supervisor, one of the assistant principals, pulled me and my mandated teacher mentor into her office one day. I thought it was to finally set up a mentoring schedule, as I hadn’t received any mentor time, and the school needed to report that to the state. My supervisor tells me that for two periods of the day, I would work as a SETSS teacher with a caseload of kindergarten students. Meaning I would be leaving my assigned classroom to gather five Kindergarten students, bring them to the defunct library that hadn’t been properly used in at least thirty years, and teach them based on their IEPs with no curriculum for me to use. As the year went on, my second-grade classroom added more students. Eventually, we hit the cap of an ICT classroom and had 32 students. One of the students was very abusive. He would round his peers up to gang up on me and physically harm me and run out of the classroom. It wasn’t uncommon for me to come home with scratches and bruises. The administration would never back me up or help me. The only people who tried to help me in any of these situations were the wonderful social workers from Turnaround for Children, who were working under a grant there at the school for a limited number of years. They would help me use calm talking methods to redirect the students back into a more stable mindset. My supervisor would blame me for the beatings and disruptions and told me that if I just taught, this wouldn’t be happening. I received multiple disciplinary meetings with letters going into my file. Come March of 2018, the Kindergarten self-contained classroom teacher quit. As the only other person who could teach young children with disabilities, my administration again moved me to that classroom but did not have any hope for me. My principal, upon telling me of the change, told me that I needed to be the strong teacher that she saw during the demo, because now when things happen, I don’t do anything. The only people who believed in me were again the staff from Turnaround for Children.
We came up with plans for as smooth of a transition as possible for these students. However, come April 10th, I had a mental breakdown during what would have been my final disciplinary meeting. At every disciplinary meeting in the city public schools, you were allowed to bring your UFT (United Federation of Teachers) union, representative. The UFT is the union that covers public school teachers in the city. During this meeting, I can’t recall what set me off, but I broke down in tears and stormed out of the meeting room. I had some sort of episode that I couldn’t control. While I’ve been on medication for depression and anxiety for several years now, during that time, I struggled. But I finally broke up during that meeting. A kind cafeteria woman saw me sobbing and wheezing in the hallway, and she calmed me down. She said, “They always do this.”  That moment shaped me into the educator that I am today. I gathered myself and walked back into the meeting. I sat down calmly with my union rep still there, and both assistant principals. I excused my absence and told my supervisor to continue. She went on concerning an incident between a student of mine and his aide, as they had taken a walk in the hallway and my student had gotten loose. She said, “I came into your classroom, and you reported that you didn’t know where they were.” I responded, “No, I said they were on a walk.” She looked up from her papers with a smile and said, “You reported that you didn’t know where he was.” I repeated, “I said they were on a walk.” It was clear that she was very upset but went on with the meeting. I defended myself as my UFT rep did nothing, just as he hadn’t done in the other disciplinary meetings we had. The meeting ended with another letter in my file. At the end of that day, I packed up my items from my closet and left knowing that I wasn’t coming back. I did not complete my first year of classroom teaching, and I didn’t care. I used up my final three sick days, and on that Friday the 13th, at 3:00 PM, I sent an email to my principal notifying her of my resignation effective immediately. This legally affects me to this day. When you leave a public-school position in the city DOE, you need to give at least 30 days’ notice. This is how one leaves in good standing. Upon leaving, you are not allowed to teach in a public school or UPK (universal pre-k) position for a full year in that specific zoned district your school was in.
After that, you can return. Otherwise, you were free to teach elsewhere.  If you don’t give that appropriate notice, you are blacklisted from the entire New York City public school system. Your file is coded, and you are never allowed to teach in a public school or UPK classroom there ever again. That is the position that I continue to find myself in, and I am fine with this. From there until that September, I worked full-time as an early intervention teacher at an early intervention agency up in Orange County. Rockland is the smallest county in New York, so I wasn’t too surprised that none of their agencies were hiring. But that’s how much I wanted to get back into early childhood—real early childhood. I was willing to drive 40 minutes north of me for less pay because I wanted to go back to my roots. I enjoyed my time working with infants and toddlers so much that, when I started my new preschool special education job in the East Tremont section of the Bronx, I kept some EI cases on the side to work on in the evenings. In September 2018, as a newlywed, I started working at a non-profit called Volunteers of America-Greater New York. I specifically worked at their Bronx Early Learning Center, which is NAEYC certified and dedicated to serving preschoolers with disabilities. I was hired to lead one of their smaller ratio classrooms with an 8:1:2 ratio (8 students, 1 lead teacher, and two assistants). This center was even more unique, as every classroom was a certified bilingual classroom. The lead teacher would be a monolingual English speaker, and the two assistants would give support in whatever languages were expressed in the classroom. Though the East Tremont section has its roots as a former Jewish neighborhood, today it is predominately Dominican. Many of my families didn’t speak English, so my assistants were of great help. What’s more, my entire classroom was filled with students with autism. With my ABA background, the center hired me as they felt I would be a good fit for them. They used to have an ABA program, but it was scrapped several years ago. Thus, the classroom that I ran was very ABA-lite, using some methods in small and whole group instruction. My students learned how to communicate using expressive language or using a different way, such as a PECS book (Picture Exchange Communication System) or an alternative augmentative device like a tablet. My co-workers were wonderful men and women who did enjoy working with their students. And because of them, I learned some Spanish! I have funny stories from my time there. I would work there until August 2020, when I was virtually teaching from up here in Buffalo.
Latino Village: Where has your career taken you since?
 Samantha Didrichsen: After leaving VOA, I started working at The Summit Center. I was initially hired as a SEIT (Special Education Itinerant Teacher) to work 1-on-1 with their preschoolers in the school and around Western New York, but they offered me a different position due to COVID restrictions at the time. I was teaching in one of their Kindergarten classrooms. I spent several months there, but in the end, it wasn’t working out and I left in February.  I currently work as a SEIT through Buffalo Hearing & Speech and work with young children from infancy through preschool with delays and disabilities by traveling to their homes, childcare centers, or schools. Currently, I am considering a doctoral program at the University at Buffalo. I am interested in supporting the creation of an early childhood special education program at any of the local colleges or universities in the region to help generate more pre-service teachers into that part of the special education field, just as Hofstra had done. There is a large deficit in the number of people who are licensed to work within the Birth-2nd grade special education population here in Western New York, with Buffalo State being the only granting college in the region. Because of this, many infants, toddlers, and preschoolers are going without services, and preschool special education classrooms are being taught by certified teaching assistants instead of certified early childhood special educators. I am also going to be published around November 15th, 2022. I conducted ABA research at Hofstra as part of my multi-project capstone (comprehensive exam, research, and student teaching). After years of trying to get it published, Hofstra’s very own online journal titled Special Education Research, Policy & Practice has decided to publish my research paper. The article is titled, “Familiar Vs. Unfamiliar Stimuli in Multiple Stimulus Preference Assessments”.
Latino Village: Now, we can find a lot of the numbers online but how was the compensation, were you fairly compensated for doing arguably the most important job in society?
 Samantha Didrichsen: To answer this, we need to break that up by the different jobs I held while working downstate: NYC public school teaching, early intervention teaching, and non-profit teaching. Public school salary: At the time I started, my salary was about $60,000. This wouldn’t go up for another 5 years until I became eligible for tenure. After that, the salary increase would have been dramatic. Public school teachers in New York City who put 25 years in can most definitely hit $100,000 by the time they retire with a pension. However, where you begin teaching can make it or break it for you in the long run, as evident by my experience. Non-profit teaching: By the time I left VOA, my salary matched my former city DOE salary at $60,000. Each non-profit may pay differently, but with my master’s and my experience, this is where I ended. Early intervention teaching: This is done by hours billable and is run by the county’s Department of Health. I believe each 45-minute session was around $40 in Orange County. So, it’s all tallied up at the end of each day when you submit your billing, and that’s how much you made. Let me quickly state this: don’t be fooled by these numbers. It may have looked like I was making excellent money downstate. I was not. A teacher’s pay generally reflects the tax rate in that given area. I may have been paid $60,000 in salary, but I was heavily taxed. Generally, the more a teacher is paid, usually, the higher the taxes are. I also paid $250 a month in tolls to cross either the Tappan Zee Bridge or the George Washington Bridge to get to the Bronx, on top of the $200 a month I paid for monthly parking. The Orange County rate is affected the same way, as the state’s early intervention program is tax-funded, so it all depends on the taxes collected in that county. So, do I think that we’re compensated? No, I, unfortunately, don’t. There are many reasons why. Most notably in the public schools across the state, but especially in the city, you will find a lot of school-tax waste. The extra administrator there, the new consultant here, while the public-school teachers are using money out of their wallets to get materials for their students. As for non-profit salaries, that also fluctuates by government funding and donations. For each non-profit, it’s a little different as to how much funding comes from the government in terms of tax programs (like Medicaid for therapeutic services) and grants. Private donations by businesses and individuals are the best thing for them! Taxes and grants come with strings attached and can only be used for certain things. Donations can be used for anything, so please consider donating to that non-profit you’ve been thinking about!
Latino Village: Can you tell us about your experience with the Teachers Union?
 Samantha Didrichsen: My only experience has been with the UFT down in the city. The organizations that I’ve worked with since are not part of any city or state union. As previously stated, I feel that the UFT didn’t do anything for me when I was in crisis. It was clear that P.S 226 was building a case against me to have me lose not only my job but maybe even my teaching certificates. My union rep was friendly and nice—he worked in my school as a paraprofessional. He was very knowledgeable about policies in the city schools as well. However, he never spoke up for me during any of my disciplinary meetings. After each one, we would talk about them, but he would say that they didn’t say anything that would cause the unit to get involved. If that’s the case, then I disagree, as the way a teacher is treated should be enough to have someone speak up for you. Our UFT regional leader came to the school once to hold a meeting with us teachers to see how things were going. We met in private in a meeting room and we all discussed the abuse the administration gave to all of us. I specifically spoke to him after the meeting and told him that I was a first-year teacher and everything that was happening to me. He told me that once the open market opened in the spring, he would help put in a good word for me to have my transfer. When things got bad and I was on the verge of quitting, I emailed and called him multiple times asking for help. Never once did he ever pick up the phone, call me back or email me back. While I am not anti-union, I do believe that when they get to a certain size that they forget what they’re there for.
Latino Village: What do you think are the top 3 things that need to change to improve the teaching profession?
 Samantha Didrichsen: An administrator that would care and listen. The support I’ve received at VOA and from Buffalo Hearing & Speech has helped me grow. When a teacher is trusted and heard, they will succeed, and thus the students will succeed. In terms of early childhood education, we continue to be viewed as overly certified babysitters or daycare people. Though actually, I have never once “sat on a baby” or “cared for a day.” We are childcare providers, preschool teachers, or K-2nd grade professionals. Society, including administrators, should understand the importance of properly trained professionals caring and working with people at one of the most vulnerable times of their lives. We need to cut the school tax waste. Look where the money is going. The money needs to go for salaries, school materials, and community activities.
Latino Village: Is there one more piece you would like to add?
 Samantha Didrichsen: Your child is also my child. They aren’t just my students. When I talk to people about them, I always say, “My kid” “My boy” or “My girl.” It doesn’t matter if I have them for a whole school year or two months. They are my kids, and that’s how I treat them. Please know that it is hard when it’s time for me to say, “You’re going to Kindergarten!” We are on the same team. Please remember this as we go along this journey together.



September 2021

I am yet to see a politician that will not preach the importance of education; equally, I am yet to see a politician advocate for a proper living wage for teachers. That is not including their private tutors in their family mansion, but I digress… For decades the educational problem of our nation has been the butt of jokes around the globe. The general education levels of course are not a problem for a society that has no intention of advancing into the future, and the bill for this mistake does not come due much later until a crisis occurs.
Now, thanks to our nation abandoning education, we have people who can barely speak English as their first and only language, and my favorite, refusing to do things actual scientists tell them to do. Certainly, Science can be wrong (scientific method depends on that fact), but the chances of someone with proper data, and research on similar past circumstances, is much lower than Billy who believes birds are government drones because a funny man on YouTube told him so.
There have been some things that have been done to remedy these problems, charter schools, for example, have their self problems that can be a topic of another article.  Is it a surprise when you pay master’s to graduate teachers barely enough to survive that they are more likely to quit the profession altogether?
Looking at the teacher shortages around the country and the horror stories we hear from teachers, It is no wonder! Why would any sane person go to college for at least 6 years, incur tens of thousands in debt and then go to a profession where they are not valued in pay or treatment? That is just a recipe for societal decline and the biggest victims are the people who need education the most. As the same politicians who are pocketing trillions say: “The best way to get out of poverty is education.” What we are providing those people is a travesty. For next month, I will be interviewing a teacher that has had experience with teaching in the Bronx, and in New York State in teaching in general.




August 2021

Imagine this common scenario: You get invited to an event with your friends and meet them or another friend group; you arrive just expecting to meet new people, have some nice chat, maybe a few drinks, and unwind, but when you arrive, there are one or more people who have already started talking politics and ideologies, “how bad is the orange man”, or “he can do no wrong.”
What do you think? I think that person is not worth talking to, not because I agree or disagree with them, but because it’s always the same story. We have heard their talking point, time and time again, from the media anyway. Unless you are bringing something interesting or original to the table, it is just like watching TV news…
There is nothing wrong with talking about politics or current events, but if everything you talk about descends into “X people are good or Y is bad”, well, that can get redundant and boring. The study of politics is a study of careful nuance and things are much grayer than a lot of these characters or actors make green. In today’s information and technology, era, we are forgetting an important part that makes information into knowledge —- Critical Thinking!
 I do not mean in the sense of the “Critical Race Theory”, which just aims to see everything from the lens of Race and singular groups; I mean actual critical thinking. Asking if what you are hearing is correct, being able to tell yourself, wait a minute, this does not sound right, let us investigate this. Just this component quickly reaches its practitioner that everything in the world is complex and nuanced. Let us look at a few quick examples.
“Communism is evil and nothing good can come of it.”
 We can unequivocally say that Communism, as an ideology, has failed, but we must know this evil” was also what saved us from the “Laissez-Faire Capitalism” Collapse. It was the unions that were born out of this ideology, clashing with the unrestrained capitalism, which gave us 5-week workdays, 40 hours workdays, paid overtime, sick leave, and many other benefits, and workers did not have to risk losing their heads as they did in the French revolution.
A person who says “communism is evil and nothing good can come of it”, is already so indoctrinated, and will not listen to reason; but we must stop or avoid stereotyping people, which many of us do.  We know there are always flaws with the way we are running things. However, if you were to point out a specific issue or concern where you found something wrong but offered alternatives, you would find that people become much more sympathetic and open to your point of view and the discussion can continue, with possibilities of learning from each other and teaching each other.
However, one must realize that having a political discussion or conversation, is an awfully difficult subject. Having the ability to think and the knowledge that prepares one to have a decent political discussion, makes one feel accomplished and complete.




July 2021

It is without a doubt the American Empire is facing a decline, not because of a weakening economy, military, or an adversary, but because both tops, as in the people with most say in the way things are run and the working classes are in a state of individual isolation. Sir John Glubb, the author of “Fate of Empires”, states that “the decline and fall of an empire begin with its people becoming irresponsible and corrupt compared to what they used to be.”
There is another relevant aspect that most say is not well elaborated, but any student of history knows will be familiar with; the isolation of the elite from the people, and most importantly, the consequences of their actions.
Sure, we may not have kings and queens, but we do have our political class and super super-wealthy that use bribery to lobby the political class into doing what they wish for them to do. In that sense, things are a little bit different, and by its there, salvageable. That is a topic for another time, but the class that does have the greatest power over the overall decision-making, s the corporate boardrooms as we can see from the laws that pass, rather than what politicians like to preach.  If we look at past empires, such as the Ottoman Empire, the palace, where the ruling elite had lived, became a much more isolated place. So much so that not only did it develop its own culture, but even its language that was incomprehensible to someone speaking the classic Ottomans (the Ottomans spoke Ottoman Turkish). It became so bad that the two literary cultures were living parallel, those artists who wanted to be paid by the elite, and the folk artists who of course would not get patronized, but fortunately w, know some of them. All of this started with the decision of the ruling families to distance themselves from the common folk and solidified with the Ottothe man Kafes (English: Cage) system, which was put in place to prevent succession murders.
Today we see a similar phenomenon taking root. From legacy students to gated communities. (*) These may seem trivial to you, but if you look at the ruling class or the rich class today, you will see them talking about and advocating policies that have resulted in housing crises and dilapidated conditions in various cities; all the while, they are protected from the consequences of their actions through lack of accountability and their gated communities while an entire colony of homelessness is living a few blocks down the street.
Last time I checked, the Skid Row now extends to Hollywood Avenue, which I find to be hilarious, considering Hollywood is more concerned about token racial gestures and demoralization (as the KGB puts it), rather than providing entertainment. All we can do for now is to be aware; for this is but one of many data points to form a plan of action.
 (*) A Legacy student is admitted to a school (often a college or university), primarily because one or both of their parents are alumni of the same institution. A gated community is a residential area with roads that have gates to control the movement of traffic and people into and out of the area.



June  2021

Comedy is perhaps the most fascinating social tool we have, one that is integral to the human condition. Through comedy, we not only entertain ourselves but can see things from other perspectives, and expose ourselves to our failings and the failings of others while laughing. Comedy is also an important sociological and psychological tool to create compliance in a group. Some have taken it a little too far. By that, I mean comedy being used to push certain agendas and talking points. This is even more dangerous than normal propaganda because one thing comedy does is psychologically disarm us from applying our standard anti-propaganda tactics and even risk being the “buzz kill” in the room. Let me elaborate.  As usual, I will be taking two examples of two sides of the American political spectrum; while I do not subscribe to either, it is important to be aware of what both sides are doing.
Louder with Crowder: I think this entire show is an example of using comedy to push an ideology. With that being said, we must appreciate that they do their research, and a lot of times if you investigate their sources, you will find that they are accurate. With that said, at times giving news with the combination of comedy is what all such shows used to be; but now they are more like political advertisements, calling you to vote differently or to call your representatives, etc. This is the board of propaganda territory; there is one famous example from this show which became a meme to this day. But on its own, is a great publicity stunt. A desk setup at a campus where he says, “Male Privilege is Myth, Change My Mind.” On its own, this could be a whole show. Person A goes to a place where Statement X is accepted truth and sets a desk and debates people who want to change his mind, but we all know that is not the point and never was. That is why humor is such a successful political tool. The ethics are completely up to the person but I think nothing was explicitly wrong with it.
Stand Your Ground: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver: I think this show generally does justice to its topic. What does concern me, however, is the ending of this one. The call to action in this or any show meant to be entertaining should never cross the line into requesting action but should stop at informing people and let them draw their conclusions; most importantly, encourage them to do their research. A while back, I wrote that the best weapon against propaganda is awareness and this is the counter weapon in the propaganda war, to disarm the targets of propaganda.  Now do I think John Oliver and his team were fully intending to indoctrinate people? No! But do I think he often projects his personal beliefs and the whole ideological package to his audience? Yes! While the intention is not there, one day, and that day seems to be coming faster and faster, when both ideological extremes will no longer accept compromise, we can see that shift.   The only thing that we, as the people, are to be aware, of and not to let ourselves be manipulated by such methods when it becomes visible in full force.



May 2021

I have a confession to make…
I have not watched any news channels in well over a decade. If I wanted to find out what was going on in the world, I would go to the news websites that I know will take different sides on an issue.
The straw that broke the camel’s back for me was during the civil war in Syria. There was a chemical attack on multiple villages of innocent civilians and children. One side was controlled by government forces allied with Russia, and the other side was controlled by western-backed rebels.
 The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), which I considered a reliable news source and respected for trying to remain impartial on international issues, only reported on the rebel-controlled village and directly blamed the Syrian government for the attack or conflict.
It just so happened that there was “Russia Today (RT)”, a Russian government-sponsored news channel, talking about the same attack with extensive coverage. RT’s bias is already well-known and demonstrated.
I was curious what they would say about the issue. To my amazement, they reported that there were two attacks of the same type, both well documented and they proceeded to underhandedly ridicule western media for their one-sided and biased reporting.
You can find dozens of examples like this. There is no doubt that journalism has degraded in the past 20-30 years. The question is: How can this be fixed?
There is a clear lack of integrity across the board on all sides of mainstream media. The only place you might find any fairness for integrity is in independent media, and even then, they are not too reliable – due to a smaller scale of operation and personal bias. Unfortunately, the only thing mainstream media seems to care about is pushing their political narratives and advertisement revenue.
It is hard to hit the media on the political front simply because they can stonewall any argument and then misdirect (as the Fox News network likes to do) or throw their favorite bunch of isms, etc.
On the other hand, money and advertisers are much simpler to deal with. Do not give them your view. Without those ratings, the propaganda machine simply cannot get advertisements, and thus, will look the other way. Perhaps they will even start using facts, though that is unlikely. Look into independent media or smaller news sources for news or information. They must work for your view and interest. Make your viewing and news interest worth something.
Always do your research to find a news agency that aligns itself with proper journalistic practices.
I cannot think of a better way of broadening one’s horizons and dealing with the media cancer that we have today.



April  2021

The question of safety/stability vs freedom has been a political and philosophical question since the very first settlements. While its meaning evolved and different societies took different stances on this topic over the years, never does this question become more pertinent in times of crisis like the one we are. The specific example we have today is the Covid-19 vaccination and the wearing of a masks.
Our nation is all about personal freedom; I believe this is one of the values that makes us strong, innovative, and adaptable. The drawback, sadly, it gives people the freedom to ignore crucial information that is clearly to their benefit. Critical thinking and proper information could have certainly reduced this drawback. Unfortunately, the education and media in their present state, it’s understandable why we have senators believing in the Qanon+ conspiracy — an elaborate prank played by 4chan++ on the innocent. The drawback is obvious and dangerous. It can happen in any crisis, someone can bring down the whole ship just based on misinformation, manipulation – and lies! One can certainly make the argument that the only solution to the problem would be to mandate these things we know to be true; but as any politician in the United States fears, it will most likely be political suicide.
I would like to bring up an important point as to why we must tolerate these conspiracy theorists. It is a very slippery slope that we have been down before. It first begins with doing X for the good of society.  Then comes Y, or even worse, when the political pendulum inevitably swings; now you are playing a game of political extremes where there is no middle ground.
Unfortunately, this is how society becomes so politically divided. All they can hope for is a figure that can bridge the gap before it all collapses. This is even without speaking about the fact, that sometimes, those conspiracy theorists can be right, once in a blue moon, as we have seen with the World Health Organization (WHO),  and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) special relationship. 
I think the solution to this dilemma is for us to stick to the belief that individuals can decide what is right, but we must emphasize the importance of “education”, as well as hold the media community accountable for providing unbiased and accurate information. If not,  the alternative is authoritarianism, as experienced by so many countries that took the easy way out.

+QAnon is a disproven and discredited far-right conspiracy theory alleging that a cabal of Satan-worshipping cannibalistic pedophiles is running a global child sex-trafficking ring and plotting against U.S. President Donald Trump, who is fighting the cabal.

 ++4chan is an anonymous English-language imageboard website. Launched by Christopher “moot” Poole in October 2003, the site hosts boards dedicated to a wide variety of topics, from anime and manga to video games, music, literature, fitness, politics, and sports, among others. Registration is not available and users typically post anonymously; posting is ephemeral, as threads receiving recent replies are “bumped” to the top of their respective board and old threads are deleted as new ones are created. As of November 2020, 4chan receives more than 20 million unique monthly visitors, with more than 900,000 posts made daily.



March 2021

 I was watching a video from Jim Sterling that discussed what happened on Wall Street this past month. He talked about how wealth begets wealth and that there are more ways to get wealthier, especially when you are wealthy, to begin with. We see that the difference here, from the 1920s to the 2020s, is that common people seem to have nothing left to lose, and they just gamble it away.
While the economic situation for the lower and middle class is worse than it used to be, it can be a worse experience in other countries. In this issue, I want readers to understand why millions of people still want to come to the “good USA” and make a living.
Let me try to paint you a picture:
You live in a third-world country, you learned to prepare a budget, not because you wanted to save, but because if you do not, you will not make ends meet; and even then, you might not be able to. You are probably living on loans, living with your parents in a one-bedroom or small apartment. Sure, it may be illegal technically, but your other choice is living on the streets; shelters are full or do not exist, so that is out of the question.
Charities? You thought the charities in the United States were corrupt, and only a dime out of a dollar donated to the “March of Dimes” goes to the needy?
Well, here they do not have to hide it, almost no resources go to the poor. At most, stale bread and groceries would be thrown away anyway. That is the reality of poverty in developing countries. Oh, find a job, you say? The best part, all those people are employed, but the salary is not enough to make ends meet. Few are lucky to get government housing.
The concept of savings is something that exists among the luckiest of the few. That is indeed the picture of a dysfunctional economy. That is exactly why even with all our problems, people still come to America in droves – with a wish to live, establish, and contribute to a country with a future.
That is the direction that a declining nation, where the welfare of the low and middle class is abandoned, where they are no longer seen as people, but as assets to be leveraged. We can see that with the discussions around economic stimulus and how the money is distributed.
Unfortunately, that is the future we are heading towards, especially if we do not get our economic perspectives back on track. Even with the highest GDP in the world, if not leveraged right, then you only have an economy that is utilizing a fraction of its potential, and only fueling public unrest.
The stock market is not the economy.



February 2021 Issue

In Electrical Engineering there is a fascinating term for noise that can be applied directly to the news media and communications. Noise is an unwanted modification or a signal that your intended signal might have gone through. 
We have seen this a lot with the recent Capitol riots. As of today, people continue asking questions and talking about it but do not realize while it is quite bizarre what transpired, unfortunately, it fundamentally changes nothing that a bunch of hooligans got into the Capitol building. Certainly, some measures must be (and are being) taken to prevent such things from happening in the future. The only significant thing that occurred with future implications, is that Donald Trump has finally conceded, and hopefully we can look forward to a functional transfer of power.
However, the news has traveled all over the globe about the incident, and the world just loves the opportunity to make fun of the great bad USA.
Meanwhile, a lot of things have happened in the world, yet this is what we continue to hear about the most. The news tends to favor the things that will be watched, after all, it is how they get paid; but the world as you know, operates a bit less bombastic than that, and getting the big picture is getting harder, especially if you are following mainstream news sources.
It is essential to separate noise from the actual signal in this situation; the method is simple, just continue to ask the questions. Does this matter in the long run? If yes, then it is a signal that you should be paying attention to; if not, then it is the noise that can be safely ignored.
A lot of things can be a prelude to a much bigger event, in this case for example.
If the Capitol attack results in meaningful policy change and functional improvements, then it will teach us that, but for our senators to act, they must feel personally threatened, otherwise, they will mill around like usual.
Naturally, the world is more nuanced, and we should remember that when listening to the news. We must remember not only do the news sources have agendas, biases, and affiliations… Now we should add that noise to this list when hearing about the news.
The truth is often somewhere in the middle.



December Issue 2020

In modern history, every breakthrough and change in the international balance of power came first from a different perspective on international politics. Oftentimes the new paradigm subverts and outmaneuvers the old one. The most famous example of this was Otto von Bismarck’s Realpolitik, which in its time had outmaneuvered the rigid diplomatic traditions of the balance of power and even Woodrow Wilson’s morality-based politics that came after it. Unfortunately, it requires an incredible amount of effort, skill, and downright genius at times to execute. A failed execution resulted in the seminal catastrophe known as World War Two.
Today we will look at a new paradigm shift that has been gaining popularity among developing nations: Totalitarianism. The defining characteristics of this paradigm have been the centralized models. While decentralized systems (such as the system we have today) have proven time and time again to be the most effective way of dealing with internal issues. It cannot be denied that the ability to economically hurt any smaller entity on the spot and have them kneel to one’s whims is a powerful tool indeed, (e.g. NBA in china and Activision Blizzard in China). This is of course not a tool available to free-market democracies.
In the past 20 years, many nations have used their ability to convert their economic and military power into diplomatic or other types of power through the use of their wide reach. This has allowed them to gain power in the reg es in a wide variety of circles where you would not expect them, such as the  UN. The United Nations  Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) elected Saudi Arabia (the country that allowed women to drive only a year ago) to the U.N. Commission on the Status of Women.
The way it works is simple; in the west, we believe in the separation of powers, and, for the most part, business from politics for the most part. Totalitarian regimes, on the other hand, believe they are all appendages of a single entity, which is true, but the extent of it is different from democracies. In a democratic regime, if an executive is put in jail for crimes they committed, the country may or may not issue a request to extradite. A totalitarian regime, on the other hand, will see this as an attack on their economy, or an attack on the entire country. It will retaliate with full force, especially if it is in its best interest. An example of this is the Huawei heir being arrested in Canada, consequent actions taken against Canada on a national level, and the hostage diplomacy initiated by China.
This is the fundamental difference between the two.



November Issue 2020

Recently I had a conversation with a friend of mine about a show called “Adam Ruins Everything.”(*)  on paper, the show has a particularly good concept; every episode talks about misconceptions about the given topic in a humorous way. The host invites experts on the topic mid-way through the episode to add legitimacy to their claims.
The argument was about how these infotainment shows are great for public education, but they are also extremely dangerous; the potential for public indoctrination is enormous. Just to give you one example: the whole “anti-vax movement” was started by a misguided TV show that was not even built on the premise of educating or informing the viewer. When you combine such techniques to boost your credibility, such as a  specific type of self-deprecating humor (lowering the guards we have against propaganda), quoting scientific studies or articles to support your statement, and even hammering it home with expert cameos, you have a powerful tool for education or miseducation.
Most episodes are relatively harmless and indeed factually correct with extraordinarily little deviation from scientific publications. There is, however, a noticeably clear bias of the show being of the same political belief and demonstrating facts from their perspective.
Potential harm exists when the show is incorrect, such as in the episode about mammograms and how it advises against the medical guidelines. I have personally talked to (watched that episode with) my friends in the medical field. Their reaction was complete disbelief that something like this was even allowed to air for public viewing.
Anti-Vaxers, Flat Earthers, and conspiracy theorists can post whatever biased evidence they wish onto the internet, even on TV.
It is up to us, the viewers, to raise the questions and decide what we should believe. It is only by questioning that can we reach the truth. We cannot expect the truth to just come to us. When it does, it is usually somebody else’s truth.
(*) “Adam Ruins Everything” is an American educational comedy television series that aims to debunk commonly held misconceptions held by the public on a variety of topics.
Editor’s Note: The whole anti-vaxer movement is taking a whole new meaning, especially during the Coronavirus and Trump era.



October Issue 2020

With the announcement from Disney in which they have admitted some parts of their company have lost the purpose of being a company and have decided to pursue political agendas at the cost of profitability. The way more, politically active projects such as Captain Marvel and the new Star Wars Trilogy have indeed been a wake-up call for the upper management and the investors. This month, I would like to recap the events that have led to the point where the most successful science-fiction franchise has been deemed “disappointing” in terms of both box office and audience. Ultimately leads to the question: Do political or personal agendas have a place in art and entertainment?
As academia had been infiltrated by Marxist thought, it was only a matter of time before we would eventually see graduates who would apply that thought to achieve its ideals at any cost to themselves or the company they work for. As such graduates grew in number and started occupying more and more important positions in the entertainment industry such as critics, moviemakers, bloggers, etc. We see a common culture of promoting what we now call “Social Justice” at all costs. This had first come to the light during the summer of 2015 during the “Gamergate” incident where the people at the side of the game journalists and the perpetrator of the incident started calling themselves “Social Justice Warriors.” In time within some sections of the entertainment industry pushing the social agenda became the norm and movies, shows, and games that promoted these ideals began to receive large critical praise. This has of course caught the attention of some of the executives in high places.
 Social Justice Warriors of course had also led to a counterculture that media could never really pin down and had taken to calling everyone in that group, no matter the reason or political standing “Alt-right.” In hindsight, this certainly did not help the political division in the country we still see today. Partly due to the fact that people who occupied influential spots in the media, those who did not fully agree with the social justice ideas, had to remain silent to keep their jobs after all we had seen that, in the path to social justice, every method was fair. Including calls for violence, harassment, doxing, and worse. In case you are wondering this is where the #cancel culture got its roots. People who did not have a large enough following did lose their jobs and their livelihoods because of these attacks and had to silence themselves. Another side, of course, was not much better with the same harassment, calls for violence, etc. There was a moderate side to both groups that wanted this to stop but as the “us vs them” mentality grew, that became impossible.
The projects with the fundamental thought that they are “Politics first” ideas began to make their debut. From the controversial Gillette commercial to Star Wars switching directors for mostly no other reason than a  political stance, we have seen the result of this great experiment in the media. We then saw that of course in the review websites. Where critics praise the product with perfect 10/10 scores and public scores… not so much. As the gap between those two groups grew further and further. The audience began posting a slogan whenever they had seen a project of this type. First coined by Jeremy Habley, “Get Woke, Go Broke” they himself had been assaulted and had to leave some of the communities he was deeply passionate about which he leveraged to make a living. This slogan very much encapsulated this counterculture.
At the same time, it is naturally a noble goal to try to make the world a better place in any way we can and throughout history, we have seen agendas and politics driving art and society, for good or ill, towards the future. A person’s politics, personality,y, and ideas are inseparable from who they are. If those are gone, then we do not see the real naked art created by the person but a hollow shell of creation. That is the natural state of things hence why the burden of proof lies with the people who wish to take certain pieces of the creator out of the product.  Just looking at the most recent news articles and people on the streets shows there are indeed people asking for the things that were considered unthinkable such as police defunding are being discussed and are being implemented with very rational reasoning behind it as well. Can this perhaps mean the social justice warriors did have a point, perhaps a point not so extreme as they had but a point, nonetheless?
Now that we have covered both sides of this question that has been floating around for the past 20 years in the digital entertainment sector (and longer in philosophy). Where should we draw the line? The is, as usual, is blurred. If the artist wants to make a political piece, that is fine. We had good and bad examples in so many formats but looking at all the failed pieces of media we can see a common pattern and lessons of what not to do.
Do not put your message above the core quality of your product. If the race of your actors is the most exciting thing about your product. Strongly reconsider.
Do not try to preach or change people’s minds, all you will do is push the audience away.
Do not try to add your agenda world views into an established piece of media focus on the original message of it and then go from there (Doctor Who comes to mind).
Do not insult your fans. They are the reason you still can create something.
Learn to separate the criticism of the media and criticism of your politics and take them both.
Harassment is never okay. This goes for both fans and creators.
I think if we learn how to properly create and experience works and realize that our beliefs are inseparable from what we see and create, we, as a species, can explore topics we could not before and no longer have one aspect of our lives be hijacked by another.



August Issue 2020

The “Me-Too” movement had shaken up the entertainment industry to its core, and it had grown way bigger than what all the Public Relations departments could sweep under the rug.
I think it had mixed results, but it was something that had to happen; people in charge who could’ve had it resolved, gracefully have chosen to pass it down until it was forgotten, like they usually do, rather than fix their despicable behavior.
This month, I would like to address the recently surfaced news about the allegations and evidence of sexual harassment in the video game industry. In many ways, if it was not the movie industry, it would have been the video game industry.
The main difference is that the big wigs in the video game industry tend to be quite tech-savvy, and as such, can e suppress the information much more than their movie counterparts. The news from the video games industry is important, not only because the video game industry is now larger than the movies and music industries combined, but also because the video games industry has always been the vanguard of the latest money-squeezing schemes that companies cook up.
For the past 20 years, the news of worker abuse through crunch and constant use of working people, to complete and exhaustion to simply replace them with the next naive exploitable college graduate, have become commonplace. However, finally the dam burst, and more and more people have been coming forward with even more insidious allegations. Most recently from the French-originated video game giant, Ubisoft.
These have become so numerous and people have been coming forward with evidence. Recently, 3 top executives were forced to resign as a result. For those interested, I would suggest you view the most recent video report from a consumer advocate, Jim Sterling, a long-time, established independent journalist in this field, in a video titled: “Ubisoft spent years protecting mental and physical abusers.”
They are the same people who have been cutting themselves multimillion-dollar bonus checks while firing 800 people in the same breath. Under normal circumstances, these people would simply go unpunished as they are simply too big to fail. Thanks to their vast resources they can win the legal battle of attrition in court thanks to our “justice” system.
As more and more of these stories surface, it becomes harder and harder for these people to avoid punishment; eventually, the outrage becomes too great to suppress. Thus, where the court of law has failed, the court of public opinion begins to form.
As the public, we must also remain vigilant against, all false accusations and listen to evidence. As we have seen in the me-too movement, a lot of opportunists have come forward to accuse their rivals of a variety of reasons and this is equally unjust, and despicable and would only lead to real accusations not being taken seriously.


A Productivity Nightmare

July Issue 2020

Working from home is a dream come true, for some, but for others, a productivity nightmare. It is understandable considering we are creatures of habit and context. If we have subconsciously designated a space to work, we will feel uncomfortable playing, and, if we have designated a space to play, then we will have a hard time concentrating on the work.
One of my biggest criteria for any job I have ever done has been how close it is to home or can be done from home. As a result, I have ended up doing quite a bit of work from home and have noticed the phenomenon being a huge factor in productivity. I would like to share my tips and tricks for maximizing productivity and show you that, just like I was in the 2 months I was working 100% from home, you can be more productive at home than at the office.
Clear your workspace: When you are working from home it is quite common to get distracted and sometimes, we need distractions to maximize our performance. However, those distractions must be on your terms and not that of the distractions. What this means is, to clear your workspace of any books, unrelated notes, etc. This includes your computer desktop. Do not keep your Facebook or YouTube open on the same window as you do your work, which brings us to the 2nd tip.
Use an extra monitor: The best way to prevent distractions is for them not to be in your face. You should have an extra monitor only for work activities, preferably at an angle where you cannot see your entertainment monitor. The benefits of this may not seem major now but it is fascinating how much simple compartmentalization can do for you.
Write Reports: Have you ever wondered why reports have been instrumental in any workplace for thousands of years? They are great for letting others know what you did but they also keep you accountable. Accountability reduces the willpower load on you and helps you develop habits. More importantly, you can always go to yesterday’s report to make sure you completed your routine tasks.
To-Do Lists: Simplest and perhaps most effective productivity tool, make a list of the things you wish to accomplish during the day but here is the twist: ALWAYS KEEP IT IN YOUR FIELD OF VIEW. Even if you are not focusing on it, it should be in your line of sight. This way when your eyes inevitably start wandering off, you will encounter your notes and will remember what you need to get done now.
These are the time-tested major tips I have heard from the experts and applied to myself. I have achieved a quantifiable increase in productivity in all types of work that I have done and would thoroughly recommend it to everyone. Remember, willpower is a limited resource, so use it well.



June Issue 2020

Here is a story from my college days I like to tell my friends. I feel it is relevant for a lot of people these days considering quarantine issues and a record amount of people never leaving their homes due to the Coronavirus.
You might have heard the term “cabin fever” and if you have seen the Stanley Kubrick Movie “Shining”, you will know what I mean. Cabin fever is a mental affliction that develops due to long-term isolation. It can first start as irritability and often escalates into various other forms and symptoms. So, let me tell you a summary of my first real encounter with this affliction.
It was our sophomore year of college and we came from Turkey to study in the United States. There were four of us, three (3) in Computer Science, and one (1) in Psychology. The first few weeks we explored the area and familiarized ourselves as best as we could. The classes were different, the culture was hard, and the expectations and stress levels were high.
At the end of our first semester, our friend in Psychology announced he was dropping out because he could not take it anymore. We all understood, from my friend’s looks, I could tell they all considered it. We would regularly keep in touch, but we were not close. Our friend John started showing up less and less to the classes and had no friends to speak of.
We did not suspect anything for weeks, but he became more and more obsessed with something that happened in his past and he started getting paranoid like Jack Nicholson’s character in the film. Eventually, it led him to beg hospitalized after trying to assault another student he thought was conspiring against him, while in truth he was trying to help him. Naturally, he dropped out of the program the following semester.
This article would be exceedingly long if I were to include the details. Therefore, it does not have the emotional impact I would like to convey; but it is more relevant than ever. If you, or someone you know, are in isolation, recognize the symptoms and recommend professional help. It can make a huge difference for you or someone else.
Quite frankly, in most circumstances, all the people starting to get cabin fever need is a friend and human interaction, something they do not even realize they need.


May Issue 2020

Initially, I was going to write about the quarantine protests, but there is an interesting cultural phenomenon that is very alien to us, but also very counter-productive by any measure, known as “saving face.”
For one reason or another, Eastern cultures are quite obsessed with “saving face.” This concept does not even fully translate to English, for it is counterintuitive and alien to us. It is the exact reason why no one questioned the Covid-19 cover-up in China. We just chalked it off as protecting their investment, but we all know had they acted sooner they would have garnered much more sympathy from the world community. This is not a uniquely Chinese problem either. In Turkey, I encountered “Saving Face”, and it has been a topic of quite a few comedy skits and sitcoms. I also heard of this in the past from other cultures as well.
How does this “saving face” work? It is surprisingly simple in thought, but quite difficult in practice, the reason why it makes such great comedy material. It is a country or person trying to hide their defects or mistakes through any absurd tactics necessary. Should anyone want to speak about those things to solve it, they will only speak about it in secret among their “in groups.” If you have ever gone to any website where the topic of an Eastern country comes up, almost any time, and without fail, some people will defend that country with whataboutism and will chastise the people who brought it up, not realizing that the discussion of that topic is part of the solution, and it is much more dignified to own up to it and work to address and solve it. That is always the case in the end.
We have stories where owning up to it was rewarded and is seen as a strength of character. On the other hand, those who do not realize or possess this awareness will instead humiliate the person with the fault. It all depends on how the owning up is done, and to what end.
In the West, we consider it to be a strong and right thing to admit to one’s mistakes and fix them, but in the East, it is considered weak, and instead, not making mistakes is highly praised.
They always fail to realize that the only way to not make mistakes is to take extreme precautions when trying something new or taking risks.
In this Coronavirus crisis, we have seen what happens when countries try to save face. This should be a lesson for everyone. Honesty is the best policy



April Issue 2020

“There is so much blood pumping through your brain, it is like rocket fuel. Right now, you can run faster, and you can fight harder and jump higher than ever in your life! You are so alert that it’s like you can slow down time! What is wrong with scared? It is a superpower! It is your superpower” –  Doctor Who S8E4
Fear is a superpower, but with great power, comes great responsibility. Without wisdom, strength is less than useless, and it can become very destructive, and it has…
These past few weeks, due to the reality of the Coronavirus, that is exactly what we have seen. People with purchasing power, go to the extreme, buying all the toilet paper (for some reason), and even some going as far as price gouging. Fear, however, has an important place in the human psyche. It’s as the Doctor said (above), it is one of the great superpowers that humans have — but we merely need to learn to use it.
As anyone has witnessed, someone under the effects of emotion will react in an unpredictable or specific pattern. The individual who is afraid is more likely to run or fight, however, the angry person is more likely or certain to fight. Their rational judgment is suspended during this fear process. The actions taken during these states are much more effective due to the altered state of mind and the hormones going through the individual; they are pre-programmed.
The state of fear can last up to when the source of fear is gone, and the individual may not even be panicking, but just anxious enough that they do not ask the simple questions.
This is exactly how people lose money on the stock market. Stocks are falling, so they run and try to “cut their losses.” That is, of course, a topic for another time; this is just to give you an example of how this creeping “fear” can damage a person while they may not be fully panicking.
Fear has a time and a place. It is a superpower that unless controlled, will lead the person to jump off the cliff.



March Issue 2020

In the past two decades, something very peculiar happened. As we have gained access to people, at just about any time we desire, via internet or phone, we have had the pace of our lives quicken very subtly. Now when something happens, we do not wait for the next day to inform people. We tell them immediately. When an emergency or something relatively major occurs, we notify others. I think this reality has intervened with the psychological rhythm of how process and handle problems and quite a few people have been taking advantage of that.
Please allow me to elaborate.  President tweets X statement, that statement hits news immediately with all the other great tragedies occurring around the world. The news naturally is not reporting advancements or good things — after all those do not sell. That makes sense! Why panic about something good? Then, the said news reports it as the world is coming to an end; they need the ratings! The viewers, you and I, instantly think it is a huge issue, while in truth, it has no bearing on anyone. This is clear to anyone who can think, but unfortunately, that is not the case.
This instant and perpetual state of panic makes people who are compelled into watching and hearing more; how can they protect themselves from a threat they do not know? Thus, they watch it, but at the end of the day, the news never mentions what this small thing means in the big picture or in the daily lives of the people. Think of the whole debacle that was created by Donald Trump’s impeachment. The Democrats knew it would never pass without a miracle, it ended up being nothing but a drama, and very little was accomplished if anything. Then again, one can say the same thing about our politicians or elected officials, however, there is a lesson here.
Do we ask the question, what does this ultimately mean? That is the question we must always ask. Not to shirk responsibility but quite the opposite. What is the point in panicking, or even wasting time on something that ultimately does not matter? This can certainly be applied to any aspect of a person’s life. It is of course good to be in the know, but it is important not to be emotionally invested in any of this news. In that way, we will be able to look at things calmly and rationally.
Simply ask the question, does this has any bearing on me? Can I somehow influence it? If not to both of those questions, then why worry, to begin with? Save that energy for things that truly matter.


February Issue 2020

Do you remember the first scene in the Godfather, where Don Corleone was talking with his old “friend” who has a request to make at his daughter’s wedding? Upon the request, Don responds, and I am paraphrasing: “What have I done to earn such disrespect? You never invited me for coffee, asked how I was, and now you ask for a favor on my daughter’s wedding?” This scene has never made sense to me. It is a very powerful scene, and I get it; but how does mafia Don Corleone have the time for such trivial things? I always have put this to my social awkwardness, but as I have discussed this with other people, I have found that at least in my generation, this thought is surprisingly quite common. As such, I would like to explain my hypothesis as to why.
I think this mostly comes from the upbringing of a sizable portion of the millennial generation. Millennials have been brought up with the availability of the most advanced entertainment and stimulation technology that has been thought impossible just a few decades ago. This is important because when your main source of stimulation is that of a challenge in the right environment, a tea party with your friends seems even worse in comparison, except to break the monotony and do something different.
This R&R (Rest and Recuperation) activity becomes much more important when one accounts for the increased work hours, and drastically reduced work-life balance most millennials now have grown accustomed to. Thanks to the cell phones and the economic system that has been squeezing every penny out of both its workers and customers without providing more value. It has become commonplace to work as a contractor with no regular hours, no benefits, no regular hourly pay, etc. The gig economy, becoming normalized, has the effects of people becoming less human, who would have thought? It becomes a very reasonable question how can anyone prioritize regular social meetings and casual encounters with friends? It becomes a much greater investment than it used to be, naturally. This is, of course, not an excuse but goes to show that the cost of something we take for granted, has changed, as the balance of life has changed.
Naturally, this is not all millennials, but a section of those who do share this view on social gatherings, which I am sure many thinks is unhealthy. This is one of the few reasons why, perhaps, a sizable group of the new generation does not view social events in the same way. After all, with all the social media around us, staying in touch is easy, but quality relationships are harder than ever.



January Issue 2020

I had the chance and the energy to catch up on some reading, and a section in Dr. Murray Stein’s book, where he is surveying Jungian Psychology, caught my attention. One of the earlier chapters about energy, and how the mind uses it to adapt to its environment, gave me an idea for an experiment to boost one’s control over themselves and be influenced less by their mental constraints by feeding their inner world less energy.
The book talks about how when a person is in the process of adapting to his or her environment, they use their mental energy (or as the book calls it, ‘psychic energy’ but that can be confused with less scientific terms)  from a pool of energy, and while generally that energy is used to adapt to one’s environment when that adaptation is complete, the energy does not just go away but begins to sip into their inner world.  This is described as a form of introspection etc., but one thing that we also observe is that after the recovery from the last challenge, a person goes into a stagnant state and begins to regress. This makes perfect sense if you consider that now this person is adapting to their new environment of less challenge. Hence the Roman saying, “comfort breeds complacency and weakness.”
I also have a hypothesis, in addition to this adage in the light, that when you are not expending energy to push yourself that energy that goes inwards will feed a person’s complexes, make new ones, and will feed mental problems. The way I like to imagine it is, that if the mind is a factory,  sending too much energy or resources that are not designed to receive so much will lead to leakage or breakage which will cause it to drain even more resources until it is fixed.
 Now that the holiday season is over, it is the best time to remind ourselves — that if we are not moving forward, we are moving backward. Not pushing ourselves to achieve our goals, no matter how trivial, will keep us healthy, and should, hopefully, prevent the problems inside ourselves.  During this time, we need to pick our battles and priorities, but just keeping ourselves fighting, can be a victory in/itself.


 -Part 3-

(December 2019 Issue

Last month I talked about individualism, in as many aspects as I could without writing a 500-page book reiterating myself. It is not that this is not a very important topic, it is just that I am a big believer in concise writing.
This month I would like to talk about the importance of hobbies for an individual, something I have noticed which is very American, something I have not seen in the rest of the world, at least not to a large extent. Hobbies are a wonderful thing, not only do they help us relax and recharge, but how people choose their hobbies might be a major indicator of individualism.
The way hobbies were perceived in Turkey was different There were no hobby stores or local game shops. No places dedicated to skateboarding or riding a bike. All the people who were interested in these things would have to in private. The biggest reason I think is that the culture in Turkey was so rigid, anything outside of going out to drink and watch TV or maybe playing football was usually seen as something far out and pretentious. In the west, if you are not hurting anyone, you can have any hobby you like and the consensus to the strange ones is… “Whatever makes you happy.” This freedom is important for an individual’s growth; after all, having your options limited on an irrational basis is objectively sub-optimal. This freedom allows for people to form their sub-communities, and not only make friends outside of their already existing group but also lets them grow in the direction they wish to grow – if they wish.
One example that comes to mind is how Henry Kissinger and John F. Kennedy’s favorite game was a very niche game called “diplomacy”, which has a sizable following – even to this day.
In conclusion, we should realize how in this culture, day and age, we are freer to pursue hobbies that support our self-growth and self-development with little resistance. We have the freedom to select and participate in these hobbies with these privileges in mind. We pursue them with full confidence, as individuals, to grow and not succumb to peer pressure. That is one of the important cornerstones and uniqueness of what makes someone a member of the Western Culture.



November 2019 Issue

Last month we talked about how important it is to diversify both your community and a general idea of how to reduce friction in a diverse group on an individual level. Our culture’s obsession with labels comes with some quite dangerous drawbacks, as we are seeing today in politics. In time, not only has it made individual’s opinions easily written off as they were part of “x group”, the individuals becoming less of individuals but pawns of their ideology/group (hence making the group 1’s view pretty valid), but has diminished the greatest advantage having a diverse community which is the diversity of thought and perspective. The fact that we are no longer coming up with effective and efficient solutions today is certainly an indicator that not only our basic competence as a society has gone down but also our individualism has been diminished.
We can talk about the macro solutions all day and accomplish nothing, but I would instead suggest a radical personal action that has got me some weird looks but has been a positive trade-off. Simply reject labels. You are an individual – first and foremost. Why? Because it makes you no longer you, a safer, a part of an overarching identity but less of you, less independent, more of a prisoner of your mind; Less stressed about being wrong and less vulnerable but less effective and more scared to stand for what is right and thus, making you less inclined to learn to what is right.
How? When you get labeling statements such as “but you are X, X loves Y!”, respond to them and yourself ” They may love Y, but I am not myself and not just X.” This often happens to me in folthe lowing format, Friend says, “But you are Russian, how come you don’t drink?” I say something along the lines, “Well, drinking is not a good thing to, begin with, why should I hurt myself for it?” From what I have seen, the expected response is to jokingly say “I am not a very good X”, but that simply reinforces the surrender of individuality even if it is a joke. Instead, take it up a notch and double down on the comedy by adding, for example, in the case of drinking and Russian, “Well then comrade, maybe they are not very good Russians, because in Soviet Russia, Vodka drinks you!” In this way, I think not only do you make fun of the stereotype but also get to redefine what that label is afterward.
At the end of the day, I think what separates an individual from a herd is what they answer to the question of why? Why do they think this way? Why do they believe this thing? Why do they think that? The answers given are what determine who that person is after all. A good person will do that thing because it benefits most people, a lawful person will do it because that is the way it must be done according to the rules. An efficient person does things or says something because it is the easiest way to achieve their goal.
These may seem like basic things but as Lao Tzu says,
“Simplicity, patience, and compassion are the greatest treasures.”



October 2019 Issue

I am certain that I’ve written about this before, however, it is something that is part of our culture that people with certain motives tend to exploit.
I will argue why the fact that our culture makes a big deal out of a person’s ancestry, is not only detrimental to the individual daily but also is very dangerous on a macro scale, due to how exploitable it is by our politicians.
First, let us frame the problem at hand. The first question we will address in the larger whole, America is a ‘salad bowl’, that at least on paper, celebrates our differences and encourages us to use them to achieve a common goal.
Too many different results in abrasion, and is detrimental to productivity and the quality of life. Too little difference results in “group thinking” and ineffective problem-solving due to members’ inability to use different skills to contribute to a solution.
For example, if you have an engineering problem but all your team members are engineers, great, but when you encounter a sales problem, your team will falter. Or when you have a too diverse team, not only will you have problems managing the personalities, but also you will not have enough members to solve the problem that requires more people in a certain department.
This is exactly why teams and companies tend to lean towards the abundance of a few departments based on the challenges they face regularly as well as avoid the specific challenges their groups cannot overcome. This is not due to a lack of skill or will, but it is just not what their team is built around. This, with few exceptions, applies to any group.
The solution to that problem, as it always has been, introducing a bit of agreeableness and individualism into who you are. Sure, that identity, and in this case, national/racial identity can be a part of an individual, but when it becomes a person’s main identifier, all they become is a ‘stereotype.’
When a person becomes anything but themselves or accepts a label, another person can attack that label and discredit the individual.
When we talk about labels that others like to attach without a person’s conscious choice, such as race/gender/sexuality, the person who has the label attached to them can easily be smeared in the public eye at least, or be the target of attacks at worst.
Generally, we avoid this by offering the person doing this kind of action, a reality check by pointing out they are an individual first; however, when one is having a one-sided conversation, such as in a rally, that is not possible, and the speaker’s words become the only thing left.
Next Month I will propose a potentially radical however simple and applicable solution on an individual level so stay tuned.




September Issue

It is human nature to seek culpability in times of tragedy, however, as the Turkish proverb says, “He who gets up in anger, sits back with loss.”
In recent news, I was quite surprised to see the topic that had been discussed during the 1990s and which was basically concluded in 2008 but being fetched back up again in 2019. Namely, do video games cause violent behavior? Now, however, there is a specific internet subculture thrown into the mix. While the topic of video games causing violence is debunked many times, something new has been introduced into the mix.
In the past few years, a specific website/s has been thrown around: 4chan or 8chan. You might have heard of these websites as “being associated with the mass shooters in recent and past incidents.” We will discuss to see if they are indeed the ones to blame, or is it just another attempt, especially by media and politicians, to shift the blame to protect or line up their pockets.  For those not familiar with 4chan, it is a website that emerged during the early 2000s, and is characterized by its loose moderation “a site where anyone can speak anonymously.” In time, more control was instituted when literal crimes were being committed on some of their boards. However, the idea that anyone can say whatever they want and start discussing in their threads and share images, turned into a cesspool — the meme treasure trove of the internet.
4chan had always been the counterculture; when being right-wing was hip, they were extreme left, and when being left became hip, they became extreme right, and to the level where to some people, Hitler is revered, the holocaust is denied, and quasi facts and very strong propaganda is spread; it is perhaps the largest social experiment of our time in anarchy.
As for 8chan, it was created as a response to what they have seen as tyrannical censorship, and consequently, a lot of 4chan users migrated to 8chan. 8chan’s selling point was that every board would be moderated by their group of people not affiliated with any organization unless the people who registered the board elected to. This of course ended up being completely ‘wild west’ of actual discourse, and on multiple occasions, some of the boards had to be shut down due to criminal activity.  Having said that, it is also a place where I have seen the funniest internet cultural artifacts being born, the said criminals being brought to justice, not by an external authority, but by 8chan members themselves, not to mention the freest, and at times, quite influential movements in the making.
In conclusion, these places should be allowed to exist in moderation, if not, they will continue to exist in underground systems, and we would not be able to monitor them. If we are to control and eliminate these deplorable ideologies, we must do so in the form of debate first and foremost not censorship, not violence.
After all, ideas are supposed to be bulletproof, but nothing is fact-proof.


August 2019 Issue

Last month we talked about “what is Indoctrination” and how to detect it as well as some basic methods of de-indoctrinating ourselves. I think it is worth expanding on that topic. I should also mention; that a lot of this information comes from Yuri Bezmenov’s (*) lectures whose conclusions I do not always agree with for the human mind is a lot more complex, and his conclusions apply to extreme cases which are sadly a sizable group. The methods that I will suggest are to help those who have been basing their world views on the ideas created through very intelligent, seemingly benevolent, however, fundamentally malicious purposes.
Mind you, while Bezmenov’s lectures in the 80s were about the communist ideology, the very same methods are being used for both extremes today. The methods being used are more refined, but the way of disarming them remains the same because it is disinformation and reformation of the human mind. However, what has been twisted and broken can be fixed, the human mind is quite resilient like that. If there is a will, there is a way.
Firstly, something that can benefit anyone, is how to protect ourselves against indoctrination. A quick recap of this topic in a way. The best defense is remaining rational. Never invest emotionally into an idea, no matter how right it seems. If you see the evidence against what you thought was true, take that evidence and gather more until you can say, “Yes this fact was incorrect” otherwise just 1 or 2 cases should make you say, yes there are exceptions to the rule. Find out why those exceptions occur; is it due to a fundamental flaw in your view, or is it something rare and bizarre? Even in programming, we often have to resort to exception handlers as such be ready to accept that, that is what it means to be of open-mind and foot firm on the ground. Reality is complex and fundamentally incomprehensible to current the human mind, there will be flaws and some we must accept.
Secondly, ask yourself, Qui Bono? – or for whose benefit? If there is a pattern, be suspicious. Always be skeptical of everything, however, trust axioms and fundamental evidence. The combination of healthy skepticism and methods of finding more for yourself should safeguard you against most methods. For more insidious methods and short hands against misinformation is knowing these tactics that will make you go “that’s a trap”
Now that we have talked about sound barriers to our minds, let’s talk about those whose lives have been impacted, usually negatively, by propaganda and how can we help them. It is very little we can do but always encourage them to look at the facts. A lot of such people are sadly too far gone and just must wake up themselves. In family counseling, the most important lesson I’ve learned was, never try to help those who do not want to be helped. If you try, they will just repel and reject you, best-case scenario, you wasted your time. For those who are still open-minded, remind them that the world is shades of gray and is not black and white.
The things we think are good or evil – are never so.
(*) Yuri Alexandrovich Bezmenov, journalist, known by the alias Tomas David Schuman, was a Soviet journalist for RIA Novosti and a former PGU KGB informant who defected to Canada.



July 2019

As a follow-up on our political concepts, this week I would like to talk about a word we rarely think about but should always be aware of:
What is indoctrination? Indoctrination as a noun is the process of conditioning someone or a group of people to think or behave in a certain way that they will not question. Unlike education which promotes critical thinking, indoctrination actively discourages it and does so, often in very subtle ways.
The reason I picked this topic is as our country’s political stances get more and more divided with no end in sight. It is important to realize why some people might be so entrenched in their views that no evidence or argument seems to change or even question their stance. This of course makes any meaningful debate very difficult.
This is caused by various methods, deliberate or not, that made those views cornerstones of who they are. Should those views be challenged, they take it as a personal attack. You might have seen examples of this in the past, with very nice or even very smart people turning most unreasonable when their ideology is questioned. This is a very dangerous and anti-intellectual phenomenon that must be cured. However, the only thing you can do is point it out to the person, as politely as possible, so that they can build themselves on solid ground, hopefully.
As Yuri Bezmenov, a former KGB agent told in his lectures, the goal of malicious sedition is to create these ideologues that he termed “Useful idiots.” These are people who have been so indoctrinated in communist ideology that they will not question it, accepting it even in the face of damning evidence or as he likes to call it, “until the new government puts them down to establish stability.” I would strongly suggest looking up his lectures on YouTube, it gives you an idea of why all the turmoil on our college campuses today, as well as the rise of communist thought on the college or university campuses today.
However, not all indoctrination is deliberate. We sometimes, without realizing it, indoctrinate ourselves into certain beliefs and start defending the indefensible, and with no awareness. The first step is to realize this and shake out of it. The second step is to learn and develop new foundations for your worldview.
Never be afraid of questioning the most fundamental “truths” that we see, no matter how popular or unpopular they are. Of course, the media has realized it is easier to indoctrinate groups over individuals. Just remember the words of Plato in this regard:
“It is a sign of an educated mind to entertain a thought without accepting it.”


“The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them “ — Thomas Jefferson


 June 2019 Issue

The current news trends in general are marked by societal division and draw into extremism on all sides, similar to what we have now.
The question is, how do we keep sane and close to the truth as possible in these times?
Today I will reveal the exact way that I have done it by combining the advice of people who have been through these before and applying it to the new age.
The advice is common and most effective at most times. Take your news from both sides, take out the differences and things in common, and filtered by common sense is most likely to be true. Look at the extremes and the sources in the middle. They will all have biases and agendas however since those agendas clash, what is not in common, tends to be false.
The other advice is to look to the newcomers in the media, these tend to be idealistic journalists, the dying bastions of journalistic integrity before they are squashed or acquired by larger outfits. Today we have a way to combine these two in a way that is easier than ever!
That is Youtube, you can always watch individual journalists and content creators on both sides of the spectrum however Youtube being an open platform you might still want to stay away from the very extremes and keep to those who try to uphold some journalistic integrity and reliance on facts even though those facts are usually cherry-picked and distorted, with some experience of watching both sides you will be able to notice the distortion in no time.
With that being said, the ones for the left side I have seen being somewhat entertaining and informative were Contrapoints and Hbomberguy. These essayists tend to research their topic reasonably well and try to back up their point of view with facts. I should however warn you that this being YouTube, you will see more shocking content, mostly from Contrapoints because part of her platform is costumes and acting.
On the right side, we have Black Pigeon Speaks and Sargon Of Akkad. while I may not always agree with their message, you can see they have done their research and are engaging in what mainstream media should have been doing, evidence, and then maybe, their point of view.
Lastly, I would like to mention Caspian Report for relatively Apolitical geopolitical analysis, as a way to balance the aforementioned relatively extreme content creators.


May 2019 Issue

In my previous article, I talked about how technology, which is most mainstream at the time, is what makes kids of that generation the most competent at it, in general. We also briefly discussed some outliers and the important point which is: Just because you did not grow up with that technology, it does not mean you cannot be competent, or even one of the best people with that technology.
There is a sense of dread with how fast technology has been advancing in the past 30 years. However, as it advanced in the tech industry, the question of ‘user-friendliness and ease of learning’, became a major question that is even studied under the computer science subject, human-computer interaction. That is because, even those at the cutting edge of the tech industry, struggle to keep up while end-users are completely left in the dust otherwise.
It was easy to discover that just because something is powerful, does not mean it has to be esoteric. Those that are esoteric, are always taken over things that are much easier to use. We can thank the free markets for that. Fortunately, the popular technology often passes this litmus test, and the main obstacle that the older generation faces is often nothing more than a mental barrier against the new technology.
I have been fortunate enough to be on all sides of this situation. In the past, and when it comes to any technology, as soon as you figure out the logic behind the basics, nothing is stopping you from grasping it in full.
The kids of that age were not anything special. With your own life experiences, if you do not erect a mental barrier around the problem, it is much easier not to only grasp it, but to go even further and expand one’s horizons through grasping that new piece of technology. Examples of this are out there, so go out and fear not the unknown, for there is no shame in learning, but there is shame in willful ignorance.



April 2019 Issue

The current news trends in general are marked by societal division and draw into extremism on all sides, similar to what we have now.
The question is, how do we keep sane and close to the truth as possible in these times? Today I will reveal the exact way that I have done it by combining the advice of people who have been through these before and applying it to the new age.
The advice is common and most effective at most times. Take your news from both sides, take out the differences and things in common, and filtered by common sense is most likely to be true. Look at the extremes and the sources in the middle. They will all have biases and agendas however since those agendas clash, what is not in common, tends to be false.
The other advice is to look to the newcomers in the media, these tend to be idealistic journalists, the dying bastions of journalistic integrity before they are squashed or acquired by larger outfits. Today we have a way to combine these two in a way that is easier than ever!
That is YouTube, you can always watch individual journalists and content creators on both sides of the spectrum however YouTube being an open platform you might still want to stay away from the very extremes and keep to those who try to uphold some journalistic integrity and reliance on facts even though those facts are usually cherry-picked and distorted, with some experience of watching both sides you will be able to notice the distortion in no time.
With that being said, the ones for the left side I have seen being somewhat entertaining and informative were Contra-points and Hbomberguy. These essayists tend to research their topic reasonably well and try to back up their point of view with facts. I should however warn you that this being YouTube, you will see more shocking content, mostly from Contra-points because part of her platform is costumes and acting.
On the right side, we have Black Pigeon Speaks and Sargon Of Akkad while I may not always agree with their message, you can see they have done their research and are engaging in what mainstream media should have been doing, evidence and then maybe their point of view.
Lastly, I would like to mention Caspian Report for relatively Apolitical geopolitical analysis, as a way to balance the aforementioned relatively extreme content creators.



March 2019 Issue

In the past few generations, we have had a curious phenomenon that many talked about individually but not as a whole and that is how a generation grows up with a certain technology that defined their childhood-early adulthood and becomes very proficient at it and not the one next and last then proceeds to praise or complain about the next generation is so good/bound by it.
This is something that came to my attention when I would help the previous generation struggle with computers while myself having very little idea on how to fix cars and this tends to be the general trend for most millennials. Especially the ones who have not grown up in the States where the entire culture of people could be defined by cars they drove and got familiar with.
Similarly, to how the Boomers to Gen X generations grew up with cars, the millennial grew up with computers and since they were so exposed to them in their youth, they picked it up as their view into the technical world. This is no excuse to understand either technology enough to use it. For a while, I believed the first half of the paragraph more than I should have, as this was the reason other generations did not understand those technologies but that was until I met one of the best system administrators I have ever seen.
A 65-year-old Linux wizard from Fredonia taught us Linux commands and system administrating. He was originally an electrical engineer which is quite distant from computer science and got into computers when he was 45. Conversely, my cousin who makes a living administering a popular game server got into cars as well as many millennials including myself after getting my first one. Turns out that as soon as you drop the bias that “It is Generation (insert generation here) thing” it becomes much clearer that the technology we are talking about is simple because the principles of the systems stay the same, the best systems are the simplest ones. Sure, when you get into the nitty-gritty and combine them, they become complicated but after understanding the underlying principles they simply become just complicated instead of impossible.
Hence, I would like to invite everyone when you encounter a piece of technology you do not understand, do not be ashamed, for there is no shame in learning but there is shame in willful ignorance as says the Russian proverb.



February 2019 Issue

There is a hidden concept or a mechanic, if you will when it comes to dealing with large groups of people.
Every action you take costs a degree of social currency, some more than others. However, the way that currency works, seems that it functions less as a currency as we know it but more as a steam pressure or heat build-up. You might have seen the effects of these in your work or on the news. When a person is seen doing anything too many times or just taking too many actions, they will draw the ire of the people regardless if it is good or bad.
Bill Gates and Elon Musk in the past fell into the same trap, that if we just do good things people will like us. That is simply not the case. People and the news will find a way to interpret what a person is doing most negatively. It is just a way of our social nature to balance itself, after all, if it was a linear transaction, we would have the same people stuck in the same positions, and it would all be very simple, however, as we all know, human interactions on a large scale is anything but simple.
This happens on a smaller scale as well. Think about kids in the family, whether the news is good or bad, if there is a constant stream of events, it tends to be bothersome, so unless those are consistently objectively good, it begins to bother people. On a large scale, there are always people ready to interpret what you are doing in the worst way possible. Elon Musk tries to take us to the stars, dozens of news pundits slam him for not feeding the poor. Bill Gates tries to feed the poor and prevent epidemics, but dozens of news pundits slam him for not tackling bigger projects for humanity.
So, what is the solution when you have garnered too much heat? I never had that in real life but from my mentors who did, one way or the other, the solution has always been the same. Subtlety.
Go dark for a bit, lay low, and let the dust settle. Keep doing your work but keep it subtle and never talk about it. One way that the young business people garner heat, even if they are careful, is through some “joking remarks.”
In today’s world with the “me too” movement, this has been made even more clear which I find most educational for humanity.
Yes, it is fun to joke around in a serious situation. Yes, people should not be offended because you said something that can be made sexual out of context. However, those things garner heat.
In conclusion, I would like to – very strongly – reiterate and take to the logical extreme the immortal words of Plato:
 “A wise man speaks because he has something to say, a fool speaks because he has to say something.”



September 2018 Issue

This one is, I think, would be the conclusion for now on the article on propaganda. I will, unfortunately, have to come back to it as our media keeps outdoing its shenanigans every other month but until then I think this should conclude this series. I had some thoughts that I had concluded today, so wanted to put them in writing
Can Propaganda Be Good? If you have seen my previous articles, you know how much I like to reiterate that it is not the tool that is good or evil but the person or intent using it. So, let’s for this one, I would like to share a thought I have been debating for quite some time. Can a tool as maliciously use as propaganda which would argue has been more devastating than any weapon in human history, be used for good? So the first thing is, can we think of a case where propaganda is a tool for the benefit of mankind, after all, if something has had such a destructive effect as allowing the rise of the Third Reich and the razing of cartage, its constructive effects may also be great. I think I finally came up with a case where it can be.
The case where the propaganda, the methods used to make a person believe or think in a way without questioning it can be a good thing would be if we had crucial information for a person to have that was simply beyond their understanding but they must perform the actions towards that belief. Which I think was exactly the idea beyond all the religious dogma, it is hard to understand the reasoning behind it and it would be too long or difficult to teach a large group of people as to why this action is good or bad. This, I think, is the only condition for propaganda to be considered good. I will have to add a caveat here. In this case, the people who created it must leave tools and explanations as to why they have thought people to do the actions they taught. This is because as time goes on, some will begin to wake up and realize this dogma has no rational basis, they will think this of course unless the originators of the dogma did not give their reasoning somewhere, in texts or in a way it can be passed on.
In a way, the last paragraph also explains why there is still a sizable group of religious people among scientists and even some of the greatest minds. Were they too occupied to see the propaganda or did they see the benefit of society going along with this propaganda? I do not know but that is a topic for another day perhaps.
Any other case I can think of is simply too easy to distort and thanks to human nature and group think, it is also even more dangerous. I think that is why propaganda is so dangerous in the end. Just like cancer, it spreads not because it is strong on its own, but it is strong because it uses the existing mechanisms in the body to propagate itself. Just like that not only does propaganda spread but is also reinforced thanks to the social nature of the human race.


Read Monthly Issues of our Buffalo Latino Village HERE!

Our Columnists/Writers:

Virginia McIntyre Vianca Colón-Barreto /  Solomon Joseph Luz Velez /  Roque Pizarro / Dinah Aponte /  Angelica Aquino, Esq./MPA / Arthur Dawn /  Alberto O. Cappas Carmen Rodriguez /  Lillia Orsini Jose Yrizarry /  Victoria Ross / QueeNia AsheeMa’at /  Talia Rodriguez  / Juan Carreras  / Rocco Anastasio 



Let our Writers know what you think! Give us your Comments:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.